The Presidential debates themselves should give us renewed insight into the candidates ability to ‘be presidential’, views on the economy, the integrity of the election itself, COVID-19, and aspects like race and violence.
We’ve already heard a lot and understand where both parties stand on policy. We can assess polls; political forecasting models and we look at price moves in the market and see that volatility is rising in anticipation of this event.
That said, given a primary job of any trader is to manage risk, it can be advantageous to have a framework around marquee volatility events like a US election. To try and how markets trade into the election as polls change and the probability of each scenario playing out evolves - where the connection between the make-up of Congress, the ability to implement policy and what that means for monetary policy and markets more broadly is key.
Here is my simplistic playbook on how markets could react given the various scenarios, although, I have left out a Contested election. Naturally, my thesis could prove to be completely incorrect, and many will disagree with the reactions I believe will play out, but it’s about the framework. We will update this periodically, with probability outcomes.
此处提供的材料并未按照旨在促进投资研究独立性的法律要求准备,因此被视为市场沟通之用途。虽然在传播投资研究之前不受任何禁止交易的限制,但我们不会在将其提供给我们的客户之前寻求利用任何优势。
Pepperstone 并不表示此处提供的材料是准确、最新或完整的,因此不应依赖于此。该信息,无论是否来自第三方,都不应被视为推荐;或买卖要约;或征求购买或出售任何证券、金融产品或工具的要约;或参与任何特定的交易策略。它没有考虑读者的财务状况或投资目标。我们建议此内容的任何读者寻求自己的建议。未经 Pepperstone 批准,不得复制或重新分发此信息。